Nach Abschluss des Kurses wissen die erfolgreichen Teilnehmer*innen wie man:HCI-Experimente plant und entwirft, HCI-Experimente durchführt, quantitative Daten und qualitative Daten, die durch HCI-Experimente gesammelt wurden, analysiert und HCI-Experimente und Ergebnisse dokumentiert und präsentiert.

Anhand eines Beispielprojekts üben wir gemeinsam die notwendigen Schritte, um eine HCI-Forschungsfrage mit einem Experiment überzeugend zu beantworten.Leseaufgaben • Schreibaufgaben • Diskussionen • Beispielprojekt

ForschungsmotivationHCI-Forschungsfragen und Experimenteinterne/externe Validität von ExperimentenWiederholbarkeit, Replizierbarkeit und Reproduzierbarkeit von ExperimentenTerminologieÜberlegungen zur ExperimentplanungEthik und Arbeit mit menschlichen Teilnehmer*innenMessskalen und StatistikHypothesentests / InferenzstatistikenBeschreiben von HCI-ExperimentenPräsentation von Ergebnissen aus HCI-ExperimentenLink auf weitere Informationenhttps://www.aau.at/en/isys/ias/teaching/master-specialization-hci/

discussions • assignments • examDigital written closed-book exam using the Secure Exam Environment (digital exam using a computer in the lecture hall). Information about digital exams at the University of Klagenfurt is available here: Center for University Learning and Teaching.

See Course overview above.

The final grade is based on the results of the following work items: participation in discussions, completed assignments, contributions to the course example project, and the exam. The scores on these work items depend on their overall quality, completeness, and correctness according to the following grading scheme.Grade 1 – Excellent: 89 – 100 percent pointsThe work item is complete and of superior quality. The work item is very well written, has a professional touch, and is profound. The student is very reflective and insightful. The work item may contain very few clarity, structure, or presentation problems.Grade 2 – Good: 76 – 88 percent pointsThe work item is complete and of high quality. The work item is well written and in-depth. The student is reflective and insightful. The work item may contain few clarity, structure, or presentation problems.Grade 3 – Satisfactory: 63 – 75 percent pointsThe work item is complete and of good quality, but several points could be better articulated, be more insightful, or more thorough. The work item may contain some clarity, structure, or presentation problems.Grade 4 – Sufficient: 50 – 62 percent pointsThe work item is mostly complete and of satisfactory quality, but most points could be better articulated, be more insightful, or more thorough. The work item contains clarity, structure, or presentation problems.Grade 5 – Failed: 0 – 49 percent pointsThe work item is incomplete or of lower quality. The points are not well articulated or thorough enough. The work item contains significant clarity, structure, or presentation problems.